Why these devices are worth knowing by name
Having specific vocabulary for these patterns makes it easier to articulate why a story works or does not β a movie criticized for a weak ending is often specifically failing at avoiding deus ex machina, and a story praised for tight plotting is often praised for disciplined use of Chekhov's gun and foreshadowing.
Some devices work because they are subtle, others because they are obvious
A MacGuffin works precisely because the audience does not think too hard about it β it exists to justify character motivation, not to be scrutinized. A red herring, by contrast, has to be just plausible enough to genuinely mislead without feeling unfair once the truth is revealed, which is a much harder balance for a writer to strike.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is a MacGuffin considered bad writing?
Not inherently β many well-regarded films use MacGuffins deliberately, since the goal is often to study character behavior and motivation rather than the object itself. It becomes a problem only when a story expects the audience to care about the object's specifics when it was never meant to matter.
What's the difference between foreshadowing and a red herring?
Foreshadowing points toward something that genuinely happens later, rewarding attentive readers. A red herring points toward something that deliberately does not happen, intentionally misleading the audience before the real answer is revealed.