PlayInfoBox

Home /Education /Locus of Control: Internal vs. External

Locus of Control: Internal vs. External

Do you believe the outcomes in your life come down to you, or to luck and circumstance? Here are the two tendencies behind that split.

Internal locus of control

A tendency to believe that outcomes in your life mainly depend on your own effort, ability, and choices β€” for example, crediting a good exam score to having studied hard. People who lean this way tend to look for their own solutions to problems, believe effort can change outcomes, and often show a self-directed approach to work or study. Taken too far, though, this can turn into blaming yourself even for things genuinely outside your control, leading to excessive guilt or responsibility.

External locus of control

A tendency to believe that outcomes in your life mainly depend on external factors you can't control β€” luck, chance, other people, or circumstances β€” for example, attributing the same exam score to the test being unfairly hard. People who lean this way tend to attribute difficult situations to luck or circumstances, feel that effort won't change the outcome, and can feel a stronger sense of helplessness under stress. Taken too far, this can mean giving up on things you could actually change, settling into a passive stance.

Most people fall somewhere in between

Julian Rotter described locus of control as a single spectrum rather than two fixed boxes, and most people sit somewhere between the two ends rather than purely at one extreme β€” the balance can also shift over time and across different areas of life.

What is locus of control theory?

Locus of control is a concept introduced by American psychologist Julian Rotter in 1966, building on social learning theory, to describe how a person interprets the cause of events in their own life. Rotter framed it as a single continuum running from internal to external, with most people falling somewhere along that line rather than at either extreme.

Is one side 'better,' and how does it relate to other theories?

Research generally finds that people who lean somewhat toward an internal locus of control tend to put in more active effort toward goals and cope better with stress, but an extreme internal locus of control β€” blaming yourself even for genuinely unlucky events beyond your control β€” can backfire into excessive self-blame or guilt, so a reasonable balance matters more than maximizing one side. It's a related but distinct idea from other explanatory-style theories, which focus less on whether an outcome was controllable at all and more on how a specific good or bad event gets interpreted.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is locus of control something you're born with?

It's generally understood less as something innate and more as a learned belief system that builds up over time through your upbringing and your accumulated experiences of success and failure. It can also continue to shift gradually through experience even in adulthood.

Is a strong external locus of control always a bad thing?

Not necessarily. Attributing every structural or unlucky problem entirely to yourself isn't healthy either. What matters most is a balanced sense of which parts of a situation you can actually change and which parts you can't.