Why four formulas never agree
Devine, Robinson, Miller, and Hamwi were each derived from different reference populations and rounding choices decades apart, so none of them is more "correct" than the others in an absolute sense. Clinical dosing calculators sometimes average two or more of them specifically because no single formula is treated as definitive.
What the formula cannot see
Because ideal body weight formulas use only height and sex, they cannot account for frame size, muscle mass, or fat distribution. A muscular, large-framed adult and a small-framed adult of the same height and sex get the identical "ideal" number, even though a healthy weight for each of them may look quite different in practice.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is being above my Devine ideal weight automatically unhealthy?
No. The formula is a rough population-level reference point, most heavily used in clinical dosing contexts, not a personal health verdict. Frame size, muscle mass, age, and overall health context matter more than matching a single formula's output exactly.
Why doesn't the formula account for body frame or muscle mass?
Because it was designed for quick clinical estimation using only the two data points doctors would have on hand instantly, height and sex, not for a comprehensive personal health assessment. Formulas that also weigh frame size exist but are used far less often in practice.