Why MPG is a misleading metric for comparing savings
Because MPG is inversely related to actual fuel consumption, equal MPG improvements do not translate to equal fuel savings. A jump from 10 to 20 MPG cuts fuel used in half over a fixed distance, while a jump from 40 to 50 MPG only trims it by 20%, which is why fuel economy researchers often argue gallons-per-100-miles is the more honest comparison metric.
Why your own fill-up math beats a dashboard readout
A car's onboard fuel economy computer estimates MPG using internal sensor assumptions that can drift from reality over time, while the fill-to-fill method is a direct measurement based on the fuel and miles actually used, making it the more reliable number for tracking real efficiency changes.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why would two cars with the same MPG cost noticeably different amounts to drive?
Fuel price varies by region and by grade (regular versus premium), so cost per mile depends on both MPG and the price paid per gallon, not MPG alone. A premium-fuel car with the same MPG as a regular-fuel car will generally cost more to drive.
Is liters-per-100km a better metric than MPG?
Many fuel economy researchers think so, since it scales linearly with actual fuel used, unlike MPG. A drop from 10 to 8 L/100km represents the same real fuel savings as a drop from 5 to 4 L/100km, which isn't true of equivalent-looking MPG changes.