Why the founders chose an indirect system
The Electoral College was a compromise at the country's founding between electing the president by a direct national popular vote and having Congress select the president, reflecting both concerns about direct democracy at the time and the interests of smaller states in having a voice in the outcome.
Small states get relatively more influence per voter
Because every state gets a minimum of 3 electoral votes (2 Senate-based plus at least 1 House seat) regardless of population, a voter in a very small state has more electoral-vote weight per capita than a voter in a very large state, which is one of the system's most debated features.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can I vote directly for a presidential candidate?
On the ballot, yes, you select a candidate β but that vote legally selects a slate of electors pledged to that candidate, who then cast the actual electoral votes weeks later.
What happens in an exact 269-269 electoral tie?
The election goes to the House of Representatives under the 12th Amendment, with each state delegation getting one collective vote regardless of that state's population, and a majority of states needed to decide the winner.
Are electors legally bound to vote for the candidate they were pledged to?
It depends on the state. A significant number of states have laws binding or penalizing faithless electors, while others do not, though the practical rate of electors defying their pledge is very low regardless.
Has a candidate ever won the Electoral College while losing the popular vote?
Yes, this has occurred multiple times in US history, most recently drawing widespread attention in the 2000 and 2016 presidential elections.